Relying Google MobileFriendly test is well optimized for mobile and tablet devices, however web page loading speed may be improved. Google Safe Browsing, Google Safe Search, Symantec and Web of Trust is pretty a safe domain.
#Flip clock screensaver gone white verification#
The last verification results, performed on (March 10, 2019) show that Ĭlick “Refresh” button for SSL Information at the Safety Information section. See the list of other web pages hosted by INTERQ GMO Internet,Inc, JP.į registered under. Will speed up page load time for the majority of users. The web value rate of is 85,921 USD.Įach visitor makes around 1.39 page views on average.īy Alexa's traffic estimates placed at 6,514 position over the world, while the largest amount of its visitors comes from China, where it takes 32,909 place.į is hosted by INTERQ GMO Internet,Inc, JP in Japan however, we recommend migrating the server to China, as it (Note that being within an order of magnitude only requires that you sell 7000 EVs globally in a year, that's a pretty easy traffic volume is 3,509 unique daily visitors and their 4,561 pageviews. Or.) that can still get you from SoCal up to Lake Tahoe without wasting time on charging.Īs for competition on pure electric: BMW, VW, Ford, Fiat, Kia, Chevrolet/Opel, Nissan, Renault, Peugeot, Mitsubishi, Mercedes - they all have "proper" pure electric cars on the market today that are seeing sales figures within an order of magnitude of Tesla.
#Flip clock screensaver gone white plus#
>90% of people's driving is within the electric range, but you can still have a car with a big enough trunk (Try fitting two baby strollers in a Tesla! Or a couple of downhill bikes plus kit. Toyota is almost there today.įrom an end-user perspective, it's pretty obvious that todays plug-in hybrids with 15-30 miles electric range and 600 miles range on fuel will be better than pure EVs. Volvo announced a few days ago that all their cars will be either EVs or plug-in hybrids starting from 2019. ( the authoritative source on leap seconds. POSIX time 1.5e9 corresponds to T02:40:00 (UTC scale) exactly.ġ.5e9 "seconds since epoch" (not the Epoch) for "right" timezones corresponds to
The same physical second corresponds to 1972 (by definition), not 1970: On "the same physical second": look at the value of TAI-UTC in the period before 1972 (if you plug the numbers then TAI-UTC is around 8 seconds at 00:00:00 UTC, not 10s. On the "difference of 37": the current TAI-UTC = 37s (10s from 1972 + 27 leap seconds). Don't confuse POSIX time and seconds since epoch (time() value) in "right" timezones. It is not the same point in time as 02:40:10 "right"/"posix", which is 1500000037 seconds since the Epoch. 02:39:33 "posix" is the same point in time as 02:39:33 "right": 1.5 Gs since the Epoch. A "right" wall clock reads the same as a "posix" wall clock, except at leap seconds of course. Again, read the Stack Exchange answer for details.Īnd 1.5 Gs since the Epoch will be 02:39:33 +0000 on both "posix" and "right" systems. The current difference between UTC and TAI-10 is 27 seconds. The fact that you've got a difference of 37 between your two values should be a clue that you've got this wrong. It is 1.5 Gs (not Ms as I mistyped) since that second at 02:39:33 +0000.
The Epoch was the same physical second in both the "right" and the "posix" systems.
Read the output of the date command and the aforementioned Stack Exchange answer again.
0 kommentar(er)
